hearing_to_discredit

Hearing To Determine How The “Chosen” Candidate Lost And How To Discredit Your Vote

Senate Intelligence Committee Hearing on Russian interference in 2016 Election – Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) and Ranking Member Mark Warner (D-VA) along with other senate members asks questions on various topics relating to Russian Russian interference in 2016 Election. The Senate Intelligence Committee hears testimony from several witnesses, including former NSA Director General Keith Alexander (Ret.), on Russian interference in the 2016 election and its capabilities to impact elections in other Western democracies.

Ranking Member Mark Warner started off the hearing by citing quite a few lies and misconceptions. It is quite obvious that the Globalists are SO angry that their “Chosen” candidate did not win, so they are setting the stage to make sure your vote in 2020 DOES NOT COUNT.




GUCCIFER 2.O DOES NOT EXIST- HE EMERGED AFTER GUCCIFER 1 WAS SENTENCED AND TOOK CREDIT FOR HACKING BUT WAS PROVEN TO BE AN IMPOSTOR. THIS IMPOSTOR SPOKE TO ROGER STONE ON TWITTER. ANYONE CAN…ITS TWITTER.

ROGER STONE KNEW ABOUT LEAKS AHEAD OF TIME ALONG WITH MILLIONS OF OTHERS WHO FOLLOW WIKILEAKS. WIKILEAKS TEASES RELEASES.

AGAIN, EVIDENCE OFFERED BY Mark Warner (D-VA) IS RUSSIA TODAY NEWS STORIES, AND FAKE NEWS.

EVEN REPUBLICANS LIKE MARCO RUBIO ARE CALLING IT RUSSIAN INFLUENCE.




If they come to a consensus that RT news stories influenced the election, or that reporting on Hillary Clinton’s crimes is equivalent to promoting “fake news”, then it is obvious that Donald Trump cannot possibly win a re-election in 2020.

By these assertions, they are claiming that if it were not for Russia, that Donald Trump would not have won, and if he wins again, a precedent will already have been set that it could not have happened organically.

Anyone who claims that Donald Trump won this election because of Russians, is actively working for globalists… obviously. So, that includes Marco Rubio and any other Republican touting this fake story. With Democrats, at this point it is understandable, because they have gone crazy.

So, is this really happening? Are they actually already working on discrediting Donald Trump’s re-election? Of course they are. The question is, why do they matter so much? Why does their propaganda continue to have an effect, even though they lost so big? There are some bad seed Republicans helping them too, like John McCain, but Russia influencing our election just seems like the most ludicrous accusation that they could have possibly come up with, and somehow, it is still going! Again and again, they are flat out telling us to our face that we are stupid, and that Russia TV influenced the election!




I will be completely honest. During the election, I did watch RT from time to time. Larry King is on on there, and I like Max Kaiser. The PROBLEM with RT was not fake news. The reason it was getting hard to watch, was because they were NOT Trump Supporters! During much of the campaign, they did not speak very highly of Trump, and RT itself seemed to believe the CNN lies, and report them. Many of RT’s shows catered to Bernie supporters. That is a FACT. During the election, RT’s shows were PRO BERNIE and PRO STEIN, not PRO TRUMP.

Same with Wikileaks. During the election, Wikileaks was NOT PRO TRUMP! Any mention by Wikileaks in favor of a presidential candidate, was to JILL STEIN.

Recently, RT (Russia Today) is even more difficult to watch. Sometimes now they are acting as if they were bought out by the same people who own CNN, because they have been pushing some pretty strong Anti-Trump propaganda lately. But to be clear, they were never pro-Trump.

During the hearing, there is much talk about Russians going online and pretending to be Americans, with of course, NO MENTION of the thousands of internet trolls paid by the Hillary campaign and FOREIGN SPONSOR George Soros to not only troll trump supporters, but Trump himself.

I do not know any Russians. My TV does get RT news network. I did look at it during the election. The Russians did not tell me who to vote for. They did make suggestions. They suggested Bernie Sanders was the best candidate.  After the election was stolen from Bernie, they suggested Jill Stein was the best candidate.

Obviously no one cared what they were suggesting, because Jill Stein is NOT the president. I don’t have anything against Russians. Even though I do not know any Russians, I would like to think that it would not be ILLEGAL to speak to them.

By the way, our domain name is theperilousfight.us. (you MUST be in USA to own a .us domain name).

Leaderboard

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *